PTAB statistics

PTAB Statistics: Fiscal Year 2020

In fiscal year 2020 (October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020), 1,513 AIA trial petitions were filed: 1,429 IPR, 64 PGR, 20 CBM and 0 derivation. In the same period the Board instituted trial on 613 petitions and denied 506, an institution rate of 54.8% by petition. The Board issued 497 final written decisions, and 311 proceedings ended in settlement.

Key Facts

Period
October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020
Petitions filed
1,513
Institution rate
54.8%
Final written decisions
497
Settlements
311
Data retrieved
October 31, 2026
On this page
  1. Figures by Trial Type
  2. Figures by Trial Type in Detail
  3. How Proceedings Ended
  4. Legal and Policy Context
  5. Summary
  6. Other Fiscal Years

This page reports Patent Trial and Appeal Board trial activity in fiscal year 2020, which ran from October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020. Each figure is a count of USPTO Open Data Portal records; the methodology on the statistics page explains the counting rules.

Figures by Trial Type

Petitions are counted by filing date. Institution decisions, final written decisions and terminations are counted by the date of the event, so a petition filed in one fiscal year may be decided in the next.

MeasureIPRPGRCBMDERTotal
Petitions filed1,429642001,513
Institution decisions: instituted5951530613
Institution decisions: denied4752632506
Institution rate (by petition)55.6%36.6%50.0%0.0%54.8%
Final written decisions4682540497
Terminations without a final written decisionCount
Settlements311
Settled before institution160
Settled after institution151
Adverse judgment0
Dismissed6
Other terminations76

Figures by Trial Type in Detail

Inter Partes Review (IPR)

In FY2020, 1,429 IPR petitions were filed (94.4% of all AIA petitions). Of 1,070 IPR institution decisions, 595 instituted a trial and 475 denied institution, a rate of 55.6%. The Board issued 468 IPR final written decisions. An IPR may be instituted only on a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner will prevail on at least one claim (35 U.S.C. § 314(a)), on grounds of anticipation or obviousness over patents and printed publications. See the inter partes review guide for the procedure.

Post-Grant Review (PGR)

In FY2020, 64 PGR petitions were filed (4.2% of all AIA petitions). Of 41 PGR institution decisions, 15 instituted a trial and 26 denied institution, a rate of 36.6%. The Board issued 25 PGR final written decisions. A PGR petition must be filed within nine months of grant and must show that it is more likely than not that at least one claim is unpatentable (35 U.S.C. § 324(a)). See the post-grant review guide for the procedure.

Covered Business Method Review (CBM)

In FY2020, 20 CBM petitions were filed (1.3% of all AIA petitions). Of 6 CBM institution decisions, 3 instituted a trial and 3 denied institution, a rate of 50.0%. The Board issued 4 CBM final written decisions. CBM review applied to covered business method patents and closed to new petitions on September 16, 2020. See the covered business method review guide for the procedure.

Derivation Proceedings (DER)

In FY2020, 0 DER petitions were filed (0.0% of all AIA petitions). Of 2 DER institution decisions, 0 instituted a trial and 2 denied institution, a rate of 0.0%. The Board issued 0 DER final written decisions. Derivation proceedings decide whether an inventor named in an earlier application derived the claimed invention from the petitioner’s inventor; they are few in number, so rates rest on small counts. See the guide to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board for the procedure.

How Proceedings Ended

Of the proceedings that ended during the period, 497 ended in a final written decision under 35 U.S.C. § 318, 311 in settlement under 35 U.S.C. § 317 (160 before institution and 151 after), 0 in adverse judgment, 6 by dismissal and 76 by other termination. Denials of institution are counted separately above. A final written decision can lead to estoppel against the petitioner; see estoppel arising from PTAB trials.

On April 20, 2020, the Supreme Court decided Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, holding that the Board’s application of the one-year time bar of 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) is not appealable. In May 2020 the Board designated Apple Inc. v. Fintiv, Inc. precedential, setting out factors for discretionary denial where parallel litigation is pending.

The transitional program for covered business method review ended for petitions filed on or after September 16, 2020; see CBM review.

These events are noted for context; the statistics alone do not show what caused any change.

Summary

  • Inter partes review accounted for 94.4% of petitions filed.
  • Petitions rose by 48 from FY2019 (1,465), a change of 3.3%.
  • The institution rate fell by 4.7 percentage points from 59.5% in FY2019.
  • By type, the institution rate was 55.6% for IPR petitions and 36.6% for PGR petitions and 50.0% for CBM petitions.
  • Of 890 proceedings that ended after institution or by settlement or other termination in the year, 497 (55.8%) ended in a final written decision.

Other Fiscal Years

FY2019 · FY2021 · All fiscal years and charts

Final written decision outcomes (all, some or no challenged claims unpatentable) are not reported because the USPTO records state them for too few decisions; see the methodology. Figures may differ from the USPTO’s published reports. For how trials end and why reported rates differ, see reading PTAB trial outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many PTAB petitions were filed in FY2020?

In fiscal year 2020 (October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020), USPTO records show 1,513 AIA trial petitions: 1,429 IPR, 64 PGR, 20 CBM and 0 derivation.

What was the PTAB institution rate in FY2020?

By petition, 54.8%: 613 petitions instituted and 506 denied, counted by the date of the institution decision. For IPR alone the rate was 55.6%.

How many final written decisions did the PTAB issue in FY2020?

497, of which 468 were in inter partes reviews. In the same period 311 proceedings settled.

Primary Sources

  1. USPTO Open Data Portal (PTAB trial proceedings and decisions data)
  2. USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board statistics
  3. 35 U.S.C. chapter 31 (inter partes review)
  4. 35 U.S.C. chapter 32 (post-grant review)
  5. 37 C.F.R. Part 42 (trial practice before the PTAB)

Educational information; not legal advice. Statutes, rules and USPTO practice change. Confirm against the primary sources and consult a registered patent practitioner before acting. Disclaimer.